Make AI Reliable with Context Engineering Strategies and Roadmap

Reading Time: 6 minutes

Gartner estimates that nearly 85% of enterprise AI initiatives fail to deliver actual business value. Despite massive investment in infrastructure, models, and talent. Beneath these failures is a recurring pattern: the issue is not model performance or data science capability, but the absence of robust context engineering. Without an accurate, governed, and domain-aware context, even sophisticated AI generates unreliable outputs. The shift is evident; organizations must prioritize context over prompts by adopting context-aware architecture that makes AI dependable and auditable.

Why Context Engineering Matters Now More Than Ever

There is a massive gap between today’s AI, which is prone to hallucinations and produces incomplete results. Here, context can add depth, turning black-and-white AI into an insightful tool capable of understanding subtlety and complexity. That is one of the main advantages of context over prompt engineering. Context engineering is the process of structuring relevant data, workflows, and environments to enable AI systems to understand context and intent, make informed decisions, and deliver enterprise-aligned outcomes without relying on manual prompts. However, reports and stats indicate that context in AI is becoming one of the most significant problems.

• MIT’s State of AI in Business 2025 report states that only 5% AI pilots generate meaningful value, and the other 95% cannot because they have incomplete customer data, outdated policies, or fragmented knowledge, which means the models are not broken; it’s the context.
• Business Wire recently published a report that found 42% of enterprises say more than half of their AI projects underperformed or failed due to data-readiness issues. Additionally, 74% of enterprises manage or plan more than 500 data sources, creating significant complexity for AI systems to integrate all relevant contexts.
• RAND, in its study based on interviews with experienced data scientists and engineers, found that 80% of industrial AI projects fail because they lack real-world operational context.

Aside from these stats, the integration of data has not exactly led to enhanced decision-making intelligence. Whilst AI systems can access extensive volumes of both structured and unstructured data. But a lack of contextual grounding is a genuine hurdle to ensuring the reliability and explainability of the outputs. Let us tell you about a few industries that are revealing this gap:

• A compliance model may recognize unusual trades, but it cannot differentiate between legitimate portfolio rebalancing and insider misconduct. 
• Credit unwriting might reject applications because the AI lacks the historical context that older legacy model systems previously provided.
• Clinical decision-support systems may misjudge patient risks simply because the AI lacks the long-term medical history. 

Context engineering can bridge this gap by establishing connections and meaning across disparate systems, enabling AI to interpret and analyze intent rather than just retrieve information, thereby helping businesses avoid problems that can cost them a fortune.

Three Expensive Business Problems Context Engineering Solves

Without proper architectural context, AI systems create problems that can increase direct costs measured in the millions and disrupt competitive positioning.

Problem 1: Hallucination 

Every AI-generated customer response, contract clause, or compliance recommendation, without proper context, is a potential lawsuit waiting to happen.

Earlier this year, two attorneys in the MyPillow defamation lawsuit submitted a court filing generated primarily by AI, including hallucinations about legal cases and misquoted legal principles. The lawyers were fined $3000 each. This case highlights the risk of using AI without proper context engineering.

Problem 2:  The Context Switching Tax

Right now, your engineering team might be spending 30-40% of their time manually curating context for AI models. They are writing custom prompts, choosing relevant documents, updating context windows, and troubleshooting why the model forgot critical information. 

Let’s calculate the cost: your average engineer’s salary is $175,000, the context curation percentage is 40%, and the team size is 15 engineers. This leads to an annual waste of $1,050,000. That is over a million dollars in yearly context engineering costs that context engineering models handle automatically.

Problem 3: The Competitive Disadvantage

Organizations with mature context-engineering capabilities can deploy new AI features faster than competitors.  Instead of spending months fine-tuning models and debugging hallucinations, they can ship features, learn from users, and capture market share. Therefore, in a rapidly evolving market, an 18-24-month deployment advantage is not just technical superiority; it’s an existential moat. That’s why companies worldwide are implementing context engineering to make their processes faster and reliable.

Case Study 1: How Verizon Used Context Engineering

Verizon is a well-known company that provides broadband, wireless, and cable services to Fortune 500 companies.

Problem

Verizon agents were spending too much time searching through the extensive internal database. This caused slower customer call handling and cognitive overload for agents.

Solution

• Developed their Personal Research Assistant that retrieved the relevant context dynamically (from the data they had arranged and labelled) rather than only relying on the LLM’s internal memory.
• They inserted 15,000 internal Verizon documents into Google Cloud’s system. 

Results

• 95% comprehensive answerability.
• 40% jump in sales.

Case Study 2: How Context Engineering Helped NVIDIA Sales Team

NVIDIA struggled with fragmented internal data, and context engineering made their sales team efficient.

Problem

NVIDIA’s sales team struggled with fragmented internal documentation, including product specs, public website content, and technical documents. They needed to access reliable, up-to-date information quickly. 

Solution

• They built a sales AI Assistant and ingested internal data sources into the retrieval system.
• Their team used NeMO Retriever to embed documents and perform semantic retrieval.

Results

They did not publicly reveal their figures, but proper context engineering for AI assistants helped reduce the time sales reps spent looking up documentation. Plus, the quality of the answer was enhanced by relying on memory.

AI with context can assuredly do wonders, making businesses more trustworthy and efficient into their day-to-day operations.

Effective Strategies for Context Engineering

Treat Context as the Foundational Layer

Many AI assistants stumble not because of model limitations but due to unstructured context. A robust context framework governs how data, permissions, and policies are inserted into AI systems, ensuring outputs are accurate and auditable. For instance, a healthcare virtual assistant advising on treatment options must integrate patient history, current medications, and clinical guidelines, ensuring every recommendation is grounded in verified context.

Design Retrieval and Grounding

Retrieval-augmented generation is not a simple add-on but a structured approach, and effective context-aware retrieval needs clear standards for source selection, data recency, and accuracy. The design, retrieval, and grounding cannot be left to chance because, without them, AI hallucinations and inconsistencies become more frequent. For instance, a supply chain AI assistant verifies real-time inventory data, vendor certifications, and shipment histories before creating purchasing recommendations, reducing the chance of operational errors.

Align Identity and Access with Context Delivery

Every retrieval must respect the user’s situational context, and integrating role-based and attribute-based access controls into retrieval ensures secure, personalized information delivery. For instance, a product manager and a customer support agent may access the same sales datasets but view them differently, and context-aware delivery enables this differentiation smoothly. 

Incorporate Continuous Evaluation Through the AI Lifecycle

AI performance can degrade as contextual sources become outdated. To address this, implement monitoring pipelines that assess AI outputs against metrics such as data freshness, policy compliance, and retrieval accuracy. These pipelines will support ongoing evaluations of reliability and response time.

Aligning with Regulations

Regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act and the US NIST’s AI Risk Profile mandate transparency in AI decision-making. Tracing contextual artifacts, such as embeddings and retrieval logs, to governance policies enhances auditability and accountability. For instance, when an automated loan decision is challenged, the system can distinctly identify the data sources, business rules, and contextual parameters that influenced the decision. 

With effective implementation strategies, context engineering can be highly lucrative for businesses, helping them avoid costly overhauls and compliance errors. But capturing full potential requires structured implementation too.

Implementation Roadmap 

The implementation roadmap consists of three phases, each with key activities.

Phase 1: Foundation (Days 1-30)

Audit current AI context workflows

• Document context-related failures
• Identify manual context curation steps
• Map every AI feature to its context sources

Identify the top 3 high-value use cases

• Clear success criteria
• Measurable improvement potential
• Highest business impact (revenue, cost, risk)

Establish success metrics

• User satisfaction rate
• Accuracy improvement (%)
• Cost per query reduction ($)
• Engineering time saved (hours)

Phase 2: Pilot (Days 31-60)

Implement context engineering for one use case

• Integrate with existing AI workflow
• Deploy a minimum viable context stack
• Select build vs. buy based on the decision framework

A/B test against the current approach

• Collect qualitative user feedback
• Traffic split for statistical validity
• Measure predefined success metrics

Calculate ROI

• Impact on user satisfaction
• Infrastructure cost changes
• Reduction in the engineering hours spent on context

Phase 3: Scale (Days 61-90)

Roll out to 2-3 additional use cases

• Replicate successful patterns
• Document implementation techniques

Establish a center of excellence

• Define best practices
• Appoint context engineering experts
• Create a reusable components library

Create a governance framework

• Incident response protocols
• Compliance audit procedures
• Context quality review process
• Performance monitoring dashboards

Data First to Context First Engineering

We are on the cusp of 2026, and executive inquiries will no longer focus on data sufficiency but rather on data with appropriate context. To make responsible decisions, context will become the backbone of intelligent decision-making and regulatory resilience by:

• Strengthening risk transparency
• Reducing latency, errors, and manual intervention
• Promoting collaboration between humans and AI
• Shifting compliance from reactive to proactive
• Embedding governance and accelerating AI adoption

Now, executives have to consider that in this age, where trust and speed define success, context is the new currency. If your AI models are giving inaccurate or out-of-context answers, book a free 30-minute consultation with us to see how we can help!

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of context engineering over prompt engineering?

Context engineering gives control over AI systems by strategically managing their data, thereby improving reliability and scalability. In contrast, prompt engineering focuses on generating individual instructions for single queries. Another advantage of context engineering is that it helps generate more predictable outcomes and handle complex, multi-step tasks.

What is the context window?

It is the portion of information an AI model can access and use at a given time to generate responses. In context engineering, AI experts strategically feed relevant data, such as documents, conversation history, or instructions, into this window to ensure the AI produces accurate and specific answers.

What is a system prompt vs a user prompt?

System prompts are the set of instructions given to the AI to define its behaviour, role, or style before user interaction. However, the user prompt is the actual query or request that the AI responds to.